For Week 5 Joe Thornton captain of the San Jose Sharks is the mentally tough performer of the week. While things have not started as they would want in Vancouver, the Sharks showed courage to come out in Game 7 vs. Detroit and play with aggression and confidence. Joe Thornton led his squad by playing what I think was his best in the playoffs ever. Thornton showed the grit that is needed to win against great teams. And, his pass for the first goal of Game 7 was not only awesome but kick started the Sharks on their way to securing some playoff history and not becoming history.
Thornton has always been skilled but at times in big games was not always noticeable. Not the case this year. He has been dominant at times and has provided the leadership his team needs to move past the Conference Finals. Is it possible that having the "C" on the jersey has helped Thornton in these playoff games? Cannot be sure about that, but I would speculate that it may help him focus more on the team under pressure and he can get the focus off of his own game and pressure to play well.
Friday, May 20, 2011
Thursday, May 19, 2011
On-Ice Decisions are the Difference between Winning and Losing
Decisions, decisions. Make the right one in the Stanley Cup Playoffs and you could be a hero. Make the wrong one at the wrong time and you will be a goat. Pros are faced with many tough decisions at a high rate of speed. Should I pinch along the wall or stay back? Should I forecheck and provide puck support or hang back so we don't get caught? It's the end of the shift, maybe we could get a 3-on-2, or maybe we should dump it and go for a change. Should I go out and play the puck behind my net or stay in the crease and let my defense take care of it? Play it safe or not. Many choices to be made that decide the fate of their team.
A decision a player makes can turn the tide of a playoff series. In Game 2 of the Vancouver-San Jose series Patrick Marleau decided to fight Kevin Bieksa, who is much more experienced at throwing fists. Why? To change the momentum in the game; give his team a lift. But, a few moments later Shark Ben Eager received a checking from behind penalty because he was fired up from the fight. Jeremy Roenick during the intermission said that if the Sharks come back Marleau's decisions to fight "a scary" Bieksa was the thing that made it happen. However, poor decision making from Eager muted Marleau's attempts to lead. Vancouver regained momentum, scored on a later Eager penalty, and dominated 7-3.
Coaches also make decisions that affect the course of a game and a series. Flyers Coach Peter Laviolette called one of the most important and famous timeouts in recent history when the Flyers were down 3-0 against the Bruins last year. Van Riemsdyk scored soon after and the comeback of all comebacks was on its way. Canucks Coach Alain Vigneault's decision to sit Luongo in Game 6 of this year's first round series versus the Hawks was widely criticized by the media as a move to protect Luongo's confidence. Chicago would win Game 6 in OT after Luongo had to come in to the net after an injury, but Luongo bounced back to play well in Game 7 and win (thus saving the organization from some serious second-guessing about goaltender moves).
On-ice decisions (and even pre game decisions) are certainly one of the most important factors in winning and losing. But, how can you train decision-making? How can a coach ensure that his team will make good decisions in pressure situations? Coaches pound a philosophy and a system into the brains of the players through constant repetition and communication. This consistent effort to coach and play a certain style creates habits that the players can fall back on during high speed affairs on the ice. It becomes a default method of making decisions. When Tampa won the Cup in 2004 the default was "Safe is death". Coach Tortorella's players new to attack and keep attacking. This provided the Lightning to play an aggressive style even when under pressure.
Another method many hockey players use to make good decisions on the ice is to pre-play or visualize game situations and the "correct" play. A defenseman will visualize playing a 2 on 1 or 3 on 2. A forward will visualize their positioning in the defensive zone. A goalie will visualize coming out of the net and being aggressive. Visualizing prior to the game (and even during breaks in the game) helps players to make good decisions under extreme pressure and with very little time and space.
A very quick decision in tonight's game by defenseman Kevin Bieksa spurred the Canucks to a win over the Sharks. With the game tied 2-2 Bieksa was super aggressive when he decided to jump up through the neutral zone. He caught the Sharks by surprise and went in on a breakaway. It was an aggressive a good decision. Bieksa then made another great decision to shoot quick and low at goalie Niemi's feet catching him moving and off guard. The result a 3-2 lead. Vancouver may not have won handily if not for Bieksa's quick thinking.
A decision a player makes can turn the tide of a playoff series. In Game 2 of the Vancouver-San Jose series Patrick Marleau decided to fight Kevin Bieksa, who is much more experienced at throwing fists. Why? To change the momentum in the game; give his team a lift. But, a few moments later Shark Ben Eager received a checking from behind penalty because he was fired up from the fight. Jeremy Roenick during the intermission said that if the Sharks come back Marleau's decisions to fight "a scary" Bieksa was the thing that made it happen. However, poor decision making from Eager muted Marleau's attempts to lead. Vancouver regained momentum, scored on a later Eager penalty, and dominated 7-3.
Coaches also make decisions that affect the course of a game and a series. Flyers Coach Peter Laviolette called one of the most important and famous timeouts in recent history when the Flyers were down 3-0 against the Bruins last year. Van Riemsdyk scored soon after and the comeback of all comebacks was on its way. Canucks Coach Alain Vigneault's decision to sit Luongo in Game 6 of this year's first round series versus the Hawks was widely criticized by the media as a move to protect Luongo's confidence. Chicago would win Game 6 in OT after Luongo had to come in to the net after an injury, but Luongo bounced back to play well in Game 7 and win (thus saving the organization from some serious second-guessing about goaltender moves).
On-ice decisions (and even pre game decisions) are certainly one of the most important factors in winning and losing. But, how can you train decision-making? How can a coach ensure that his team will make good decisions in pressure situations? Coaches pound a philosophy and a system into the brains of the players through constant repetition and communication. This consistent effort to coach and play a certain style creates habits that the players can fall back on during high speed affairs on the ice. It becomes a default method of making decisions. When Tampa won the Cup in 2004 the default was "Safe is death". Coach Tortorella's players new to attack and keep attacking. This provided the Lightning to play an aggressive style even when under pressure.
Another method many hockey players use to make good decisions on the ice is to pre-play or visualize game situations and the "correct" play. A defenseman will visualize playing a 2 on 1 or 3 on 2. A forward will visualize their positioning in the defensive zone. A goalie will visualize coming out of the net and being aggressive. Visualizing prior to the game (and even during breaks in the game) helps players to make good decisions under extreme pressure and with very little time and space.
A very quick decision in tonight's game by defenseman Kevin Bieksa spurred the Canucks to a win over the Sharks. With the game tied 2-2 Bieksa was super aggressive when he decided to jump up through the neutral zone. He caught the Sharks by surprise and went in on a breakaway. It was an aggressive a good decision. Bieksa then made another great decision to shoot quick and low at goalie Niemi's feet catching him moving and off guard. The result a 3-2 lead. Vancouver may not have won handily if not for Bieksa's quick thinking.
Sunday, May 15, 2011
Tampa - really? The Lightning are ahead again
Where did the Tampa Bay Lightning come from? Many predicted them to make the playoffs, but the conference finals? Well, we shouldn't be surprised. This team had a great regular season. They have snipers, strong role players, and picked up an experienced goalie at the deadline. All in all, Tampa has a great shot of moving on and winning the Cup. St. Louis and Lecavalier have already won it and are playing like they want another one. Adding players like Simon Gagne in the off season should not be underestimated. Gagne is a solid 2-way player, and when healthy he can play on a shutdown line and score goals.
I don't want to say I expected Tampa to make it this far, but new coach Guy Boucher has been taking steps since last summer to create a winning environment in Tampa. And it is working. Check out this article from last summer talking about Boucher's efforts to adjust the culture in Tampa.
www.tampabay.com/sports/hockey/lightning/article1109690.ece
Game 2 is huge of course. Tampa wins and they will move on. B's win and it's all up in the air. The Lightning are beginning to make a believer out of me. Winning three straight against the Pens and then sweeping the Caps? That is just as impressive as Montreal's run last season.
Tampa has that feel to them. They are finding ways to get it done. For example, Bergenheim has 8 goals. He has almost matched his regular season total of 10!
Expect the Lightning to come out loose and flying in Game 2. The Bruins will match them early, but will need to get a lead. Otherwise the pressure in TD Garden will be palatable. Without Patrice Bergeron Boston is vulnerable and Tampa is ready to take advantage. If Boston stays out of the penalty box and can get their nose in front their chances are good. But, if Tampa gets on the power play this series could be shorter than expected.
I don't want to say I expected Tampa to make it this far, but new coach Guy Boucher has been taking steps since last summer to create a winning environment in Tampa. And it is working. Check out this article from last summer talking about Boucher's efforts to adjust the culture in Tampa.
www.tampabay.com/sports/hockey/lightning/article1109690.ece
Game 2 is huge of course. Tampa wins and they will move on. B's win and it's all up in the air. The Lightning are beginning to make a believer out of me. Winning three straight against the Pens and then sweeping the Caps? That is just as impressive as Montreal's run last season.
Tampa has that feel to them. They are finding ways to get it done. For example, Bergenheim has 8 goals. He has almost matched his regular season total of 10!
Expect the Lightning to come out loose and flying in Game 2. The Bruins will match them early, but will need to get a lead. Otherwise the pressure in TD Garden will be palatable. Without Patrice Bergeron Boston is vulnerable and Tampa is ready to take advantage. If Boston stays out of the penalty box and can get their nose in front their chances are good. But, if Tampa gets on the power play this series could be shorter than expected.
Mind Meld from USA Hockey Magazine
This article written by Jess Myers for USA Hockey magazine discusses some of the important reasons why elite hockey players use sport psychology. Jess did a great job of writing this article!
www.usahockeymagazine.com/article/2011-03/mind-meld
www.usahockeymagazine.com/article/2011-03/mind-meld
Friday, May 13, 2011
Mentally Tough Performer of the Week (Week 4) - Ryan Kesler
We continue to see great performances in these 2011 NHL Playoffs. Datsyuk has been dazzling with the puck. Niemi and Howard both have played outstanding between the pipes. But the Mentally Tough Performer of the Week for Week 4 is Ryan Kesler of the Vancouver Canucks. He is doing everything the Canucks need on the run to win their 1st Stanley Cup. Winning faceoffs. Killing penalties. Scoring brilliant goals on the rush. Grinding down low. Scoring an OT goal. Playing with great energy and intensity. Kesler is leading his team.
Kesler is having an outstanding playoff season despite the talk about him not scoring in the playoffs and being a bit of a disappointment. I thought those comments were harsh since he usually plays against the other team's top line and has defense-first responsibility. No matter; against the Preds Kesler raised his game big time and played like a man on a mission. Nashville Coach Barry Trotz described Kesler's superior play as;"six of the most incredible games you will ever see". If you want to read more about Kesler's playoff efforts go to
http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/news?slug=prov-ca-4754301
The Sharks better be prepared to match Kesler's intensity in the Conference Finals or they will find themselves down early in the series. Kesler and the Canucks will be rested, but not too rested. The Sharks, on the other hand, played a physically and an emotionally draining series. It will be interesting to see their legs and focus in Game 1.
Kesler is having an outstanding playoff season despite the talk about him not scoring in the playoffs and being a bit of a disappointment. I thought those comments were harsh since he usually plays against the other team's top line and has defense-first responsibility. No matter; against the Preds Kesler raised his game big time and played like a man on a mission. Nashville Coach Barry Trotz described Kesler's superior play as;"six of the most incredible games you will ever see". If you want to read more about Kesler's playoff efforts go to
http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/news?slug=prov-ca-4754301
The Sharks better be prepared to match Kesler's intensity in the Conference Finals or they will find themselves down early in the series. Kesler and the Canucks will be rested, but not too rested. The Sharks, on the other hand, played a physically and an emotionally draining series. It will be interesting to see their legs and focus in Game 1.
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Mentally Tough Performer of the Week (Week 3): Tim Thomas
Ok, so you are going to believe that I only pick goaltenders for the mentally tough performer of the week. But, let's give them credit. They play a pressure position and can feel like they are out on an island.
Tim Thomas, goaltender for the Boston Bruins is the mentally tough performer of the week. He has been spectacular for the B's in the first 3 games against Philly. In Game 2 Thomas made over 50 saves, many of them spectacular saves against a hard-driving James Van Riemsdyk. Thomas has remained cool and calm in the net, and created an air of invincibility that has given the Bruins extreme confidence, and the Flyers fits of frustration. If Thomas continues to make enormous reaction saves the B's could well be playing for the Cup.
Tim Thomas, goaltender for the Boston Bruins is the mentally tough performer of the week. He has been spectacular for the B's in the first 3 games against Philly. In Game 2 Thomas made over 50 saves, many of them spectacular saves against a hard-driving James Van Riemsdyk. Thomas has remained cool and calm in the net, and created an air of invincibility that has given the Bruins extreme confidence, and the Flyers fits of frustration. If Thomas continues to make enormous reaction saves the B's could well be playing for the Cup.
Why are Road Teams winning more often?
The 2011 NHL Playoffs have been interesting to say the least. OT games almost every night. Four 7-game series in the first round. And, the road teams winning more than half of the games. Why are the road teams doing so well? Winning on the road in the NBA is a significant achievement and often leads to a series victory. In the NHL road wins have become a nightly occurrence.
In the first round of the playoffs home teams were only 23-26, highlighted by the Sharks-Kings where the home team only won one of six games in the series. In the second round road teams are at it again. Home teams have won only four of the first ten games, with the Sharks the only team to win two at home to start the series. In the East the one and two seeds lost their first 2 home games.
What are the reasons for this winning trend for road teams? Could just be luck or coincidence. In the next two rounds home teams could dominate. Even if they do I think there is something to this trend. The pressure of the expectations that a team is supposed to win at home could be the reason. Home teams feel they HAVE to win as well as entertain their fans.
Expectations are a funny thing. Good to have high expectations because that is how we achieve great things. However, expectations can feel like a 500 lb. gorilla on your back. Ask the Canucks in the first round against the Hawks. When they won in OT in Game 7 the release of emotion, mostly relief, was intense. One of the most emotional scenes in recent memory (for a first round game).
Expectations can create pressure. Home teams are expected to win, thus the saying that a series hasn't really started until a home team loses. Peter Laviolette of the Flyers attempted to add to the pressure the Bruins were feeling in their home arena going into Game 3.
"When you lose your first two games in your home building, I would say that there is a real expectation for the Bruins to win the series now," he said following Game 2. "So it relieves us of the pressure, I believe, a little bit, to just go in and play a game in Boston."
A day later, he felt the same way.
"We're going to go into Boston and have some fun," he told reporters Tuesday. "We just put our comfortable slippers on. … The pressure, it really gets alleviated a bit when you're down."
(Bruins a win away from another 3-0 lead on Flyers, NHL.com, www.nhl.com/ice/preview.htm?id=2010030223&navid=sb:preview)
The Bruins, however, handled it well scoring twice in the first minute of the game. However, when a home team does not get that lead you can feel the pressure in the building. The fans become less vocal and more nervous. The team may start pressing and making decisions out of the ordinary. The home team's power play tries to be perfect and fails to play a simple style of hockey that is more likely to lead to goals. The expectations start to become pressure for the home team. And pressure can lead to thinking too much instead of reacting, hesitating instead of being proactive, and being passive instead of aggressive.
Meanwhile, I believe professional hockey coaches have become experts at preparing their teams to play on the road. Teams play a simpler game, look to make fewer mistakes and get the puck on net. Often this equates to better performances.
Expectations are all about perception. If a team believes that they SHOULD or HAVE TO win then the pressure will increase. If, a home team can take a road team attitude into a game - believe in it's chances, but not place upon themselves the added burden of having to win - they can stick to a simpler style of play, and play a relaxed, confident hockey.
This is why coaches sometimes stay in hotels even though they are in their home city. To get the team away from any distractions, and create a road mentality. Right now the eight teams remaining could all benefit from a road mentality at home.
In the first round of the playoffs home teams were only 23-26, highlighted by the Sharks-Kings where the home team only won one of six games in the series. In the second round road teams are at it again. Home teams have won only four of the first ten games, with the Sharks the only team to win two at home to start the series. In the East the one and two seeds lost their first 2 home games.
What are the reasons for this winning trend for road teams? Could just be luck or coincidence. In the next two rounds home teams could dominate. Even if they do I think there is something to this trend. The pressure of the expectations that a team is supposed to win at home could be the reason. Home teams feel they HAVE to win as well as entertain their fans.
Expectations are a funny thing. Good to have high expectations because that is how we achieve great things. However, expectations can feel like a 500 lb. gorilla on your back. Ask the Canucks in the first round against the Hawks. When they won in OT in Game 7 the release of emotion, mostly relief, was intense. One of the most emotional scenes in recent memory (for a first round game).
Expectations can create pressure. Home teams are expected to win, thus the saying that a series hasn't really started until a home team loses. Peter Laviolette of the Flyers attempted to add to the pressure the Bruins were feeling in their home arena going into Game 3.
"When you lose your first two games in your home building, I would say that there is a real expectation for the Bruins to win the series now," he said following Game 2. "So it relieves us of the pressure, I believe, a little bit, to just go in and play a game in Boston."
A day later, he felt the same way.
"We're going to go into Boston and have some fun," he told reporters Tuesday. "We just put our comfortable slippers on. … The pressure, it really gets alleviated a bit when you're down."
(Bruins a win away from another 3-0 lead on Flyers, NHL.com, www.nhl.com/ice/preview.htm?id=2010030223&navid=sb:preview)
The Bruins, however, handled it well scoring twice in the first minute of the game. However, when a home team does not get that lead you can feel the pressure in the building. The fans become less vocal and more nervous. The team may start pressing and making decisions out of the ordinary. The home team's power play tries to be perfect and fails to play a simple style of hockey that is more likely to lead to goals. The expectations start to become pressure for the home team. And pressure can lead to thinking too much instead of reacting, hesitating instead of being proactive, and being passive instead of aggressive.
Meanwhile, I believe professional hockey coaches have become experts at preparing their teams to play on the road. Teams play a simpler game, look to make fewer mistakes and get the puck on net. Often this equates to better performances.
Expectations are all about perception. If a team believes that they SHOULD or HAVE TO win then the pressure will increase. If, a home team can take a road team attitude into a game - believe in it's chances, but not place upon themselves the added burden of having to win - they can stick to a simpler style of play, and play a relaxed, confident hockey.
This is why coaches sometimes stay in hotels even though they are in their home city. To get the team away from any distractions, and create a road mentality. Right now the eight teams remaining could all benefit from a road mentality at home.
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Mentally Tough Performer of the Week (Week 2) Dwayne Roloson
It was a very tough decision to select the most mentally tough player from Round 1. With four Game 7s and some big time efforts from goaltenders, forwards and defenseman a number of players are deserving. Alex Burrows, Corey Crawford, and Brian Boucher all came up big for their teams but I am going to go with Dwayne Roloson goaltender for the Tampa Bay Lightning. Roloson was the difference for the Lightning in defeating the Penguins in Game 7 at the Consol Energy Center. His 36 save shutout improved his record in elimination games to 6-0. A big time effort! Furthermore, Roloson's confidence and composure in the net provided the Lightning the solid consistency to finish off the Penguins on the road in Game 7. Without Roloson most likely the Pens are still at the office and not at the links today.
Luongo: Fragile but gifted?
Luongo the fragile and gifted goaltender from Vancouver. This was the opening for the Versus coverage of the Canucks and Predators. I like John Forslund, always liked his play-by-play in Carolina, but aren't we being too speculative? Who knows just how mentally tough an athlete Luongo is?
Think about the pressure Luongo has been under. He is Canada's pick for the goalie to win gold in the Olympics and yet the nation holds it breath with every shot on goal. He is the #1 man for Vancouver and considered one of the best goalies in the NHL. Yet, the media continually talk about how Luongo struggles with pressure and the prevailing thought was we had no idea what to expect in Game 7. The Hawks were in his head. Would he fail again? Would he crumble under the weight of a nation hoping for a Stanley Cup winner?
Well guess what Roberto Luongo got it done, in OT, only giving up 1 goal. He was solid, and while he did seem to be fighting off high shots more than saving them with confidence, he looked to me like he was playing a controlled, composed game. He came out of the net and played the puck well. He left few rebounds. And no long shots caused him great concerns. Was he scared? Yeah maybe a little. But, wouldn't most goalies be freaked out in that situation? Let's give Luongo kudos for coming up big in Game 7 with immense pressure on his shoulders. Being pulled in Games 4 and 5 and not started in Game 6; then coming back to shut down the Hawks in the biggest game of the year? That showed some mental toughness. Realize that mental toughness is not about being perfect or impervious to anxiety. Mental toughness is about bouncing back, playing big in big games, believing in one's self. Just maybe Luongo is tougher than we think. I guess time will tell if I am right or just about everyone in the media is right.
Think about the pressure Luongo has been under. He is Canada's pick for the goalie to win gold in the Olympics and yet the nation holds it breath with every shot on goal. He is the #1 man for Vancouver and considered one of the best goalies in the NHL. Yet, the media continually talk about how Luongo struggles with pressure and the prevailing thought was we had no idea what to expect in Game 7. The Hawks were in his head. Would he fail again? Would he crumble under the weight of a nation hoping for a Stanley Cup winner?
Well guess what Roberto Luongo got it done, in OT, only giving up 1 goal. He was solid, and while he did seem to be fighting off high shots more than saving them with confidence, he looked to me like he was playing a controlled, composed game. He came out of the net and played the puck well. He left few rebounds. And no long shots caused him great concerns. Was he scared? Yeah maybe a little. But, wouldn't most goalies be freaked out in that situation? Let's give Luongo kudos for coming up big in Game 7 with immense pressure on his shoulders. Being pulled in Games 4 and 5 and not started in Game 6; then coming back to shut down the Hawks in the biggest game of the year? That showed some mental toughness. Realize that mental toughness is not about being perfect or impervious to anxiety. Mental toughness is about bouncing back, playing big in big games, believing in one's self. Just maybe Luongo is tougher than we think. I guess time will tell if I am right or just about everyone in the media is right.
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Game 7s Galore! Managing emotions the key to winning a Game 7
How fortunate as hockey fans are we with last night's two Game 7 battles, and two more tonight? This frequency of Game 7s is rare. The intensity of the Game 7s last night were a treat. The ability to be aggressive, intense, and control emotions so you don't run around and get out of position or take penalties is a skill that is essential to win a Stanley Cup.
You will want to watch for the all important battle of emotions as the teams attempt to stay calm while being intense and aggressive. You may have heard Danny Briere and other players talk about the need to manage emotions in a Game 7. I wrote about this a few years ago for nhl.com. You can still find that article at
www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=371377
There are several very good articles on Game 7 on nhl.com that if Game 7 interests you like it does me you will want to read.
Last night I thought Philly, Vancouver, and Chicago all brought the intensity and played to win. Buffalo seemed a little tight, awestruck, who knows. Although they were hard to figure throughout the series. Sometimes aggressive and other times playing back. When Philly brought it in the first period they didn't seem to have an answer. The turning point however was the goal by Braydon Coburn in the last minute of the first period that went off Mike Grier's glove. Without that goal the game may have settled and be more even.
The Flyers' mental approach to Game 7 was outstanding. Give credit to Peter Laviolette who has a knack for winning Game 7s (he won two with the Hurricanes to win the Cup) because he emphasizes having fun, playing loose and yet intense hockey. Also, give credit to Mike Richards, Chris Pronger, Kimmo Timonen, Danny Briere... - the leadership of the team. They have great belief in their team and trust that they can get it done in Game 7.
Probably because of their experience from last season (this is what the players were crediting after the game in the press conference), the Flyers have "resilient confidence" which allows them to play with composure and confidence in the biggest moments. What is resilient confidence? The confidence that is unshakeable despite being down 3-0 in Game 6 and despite having goaltending concerns. It is the ability to bounce back when things are not going your way. To dig deep and execute even when your season is on the line. The Flyers, just like in 2010, are showing their resilience in 2011. Flyers fans can thank Daniel Briere for his Game 6 talk with his team between periods. Briere has definitely been a leader for his team.
You will want to watch for the all important battle of emotions as the teams attempt to stay calm while being intense and aggressive. You may have heard Danny Briere and other players talk about the need to manage emotions in a Game 7. I wrote about this a few years ago for nhl.com. You can still find that article at
www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=371377
There are several very good articles on Game 7 on nhl.com that if Game 7 interests you like it does me you will want to read.
Last night I thought Philly, Vancouver, and Chicago all brought the intensity and played to win. Buffalo seemed a little tight, awestruck, who knows. Although they were hard to figure throughout the series. Sometimes aggressive and other times playing back. When Philly brought it in the first period they didn't seem to have an answer. The turning point however was the goal by Braydon Coburn in the last minute of the first period that went off Mike Grier's glove. Without that goal the game may have settled and be more even.
The Flyers' mental approach to Game 7 was outstanding. Give credit to Peter Laviolette who has a knack for winning Game 7s (he won two with the Hurricanes to win the Cup) because he emphasizes having fun, playing loose and yet intense hockey. Also, give credit to Mike Richards, Chris Pronger, Kimmo Timonen, Danny Briere... - the leadership of the team. They have great belief in their team and trust that they can get it done in Game 7.
Probably because of their experience from last season (this is what the players were crediting after the game in the press conference), the Flyers have "resilient confidence" which allows them to play with composure and confidence in the biggest moments. What is resilient confidence? The confidence that is unshakeable despite being down 3-0 in Game 6 and despite having goaltending concerns. It is the ability to bounce back when things are not going your way. To dig deep and execute even when your season is on the line. The Flyers, just like in 2010, are showing their resilience in 2011. Flyers fans can thank Daniel Briere for his Game 6 talk with his team between periods. Briere has definitely been a leader for his team.
What a Difference a Year Makes for the Hawks and Canucks
What a difference a year makes. The Canucks imploded against the Hawks last year in the playoffs. And, it seemed it could happen again - as late as Burrows' missed penalty shot in the 3rd period of Game 7 or his penalty in OT. But, the Canucks were able to overcome their archenemy; the team which many Canadians believe has kept Vancouver from winning the Cup.
The biggest differences in this matchup from last year were:
a) The Canucks were able to find the balance between aggressive and under control.
b) The Hawks made too many mistakes including Campoli's giveaway to Burrows for the game winning goal
c) Luongo survived Game 7 (I'll write about this in separate post)
If you remember in the 2010 playoffs a big part of the Canucks implosion was their inability to stay out of the penalty box. They played with great intensity but could not manage it. This year Vancouver did a much better job of being intense and under control. They put themselves in fewer bad spots (well, except for the penalty in OT), and when they did they played with composure. I give a lot of credit to the coaching staff and the team. Their Game 7 approach was excellent. Play with intensity and be the aggressor. Don't sit back and hope the Hawks give it to you. This took the pressure off of Luongo and let him settle in to the game.
Defenseman Alex Edler was outstanding as usual. He exemplified the game the Canucks wanted to play in Game 7 after losing 3 straight. Hard, physical, fast, composed, confident. Edler drilled a number of Hawks forwards without taking a penalty. In fact, the Edler, Kesler, and the Canucks set the tempo early with their intensity and fast play. The Hawks responded, but for the most part the Canucks were the better team.
Chicago played desperate the last week and you have to give them credit for bringing from 0-3 to Game 7. However, they made far too many mistakes and it was not just their young players that were responsible. Veterans like Seabrook and Campoli were turning the puck over. Keith even had some bumps early in the series. Corey Crawford was outstanding in Game 7 and really kept the Hawks in it. Without Crawford playing lights out the Canucks skate away with Game 7 and Toews unbelievable effort to tie the game shorthanded is not a GTG and an afterthought.
How about Toews? Shut down by Kesler for almost 7 games and he scores shorthanded with less than 2 minutes left in the game to tie it. The MVP from the Vancouver Games almost singlehandedly gave his home country Canada a collective coronary.
I also got to write that Ryan Kesler was better in Game 7, but I think the media were off when criticizing him for not scoring. When your task is to eliminate Toews you have your hands full. Offense becomes a secondary thought. Kesler was outstanding in Game 7. He was physical and set up the first goal. Look for Kelser to score more in the second round.
So, the final thoughts on this epic first round series between Vancouver and Chicago is that the Canucks were able to overcome the defending champs best effort. This should provide the boost the Canucks need to play with confidence, composure and intensity in the conference semis. On the other hand, Chicago has to look at why they were unable to play with consistency throughout 2010-11 and fix it for next season.
The biggest differences in this matchup from last year were:
a) The Canucks were able to find the balance between aggressive and under control.
b) The Hawks made too many mistakes including Campoli's giveaway to Burrows for the game winning goal
c) Luongo survived Game 7 (I'll write about this in separate post)
If you remember in the 2010 playoffs a big part of the Canucks implosion was their inability to stay out of the penalty box. They played with great intensity but could not manage it. This year Vancouver did a much better job of being intense and under control. They put themselves in fewer bad spots (well, except for the penalty in OT), and when they did they played with composure. I give a lot of credit to the coaching staff and the team. Their Game 7 approach was excellent. Play with intensity and be the aggressor. Don't sit back and hope the Hawks give it to you. This took the pressure off of Luongo and let him settle in to the game.
Defenseman Alex Edler was outstanding as usual. He exemplified the game the Canucks wanted to play in Game 7 after losing 3 straight. Hard, physical, fast, composed, confident. Edler drilled a number of Hawks forwards without taking a penalty. In fact, the Edler, Kesler, and the Canucks set the tempo early with their intensity and fast play. The Hawks responded, but for the most part the Canucks were the better team.
Chicago played desperate the last week and you have to give them credit for bringing from 0-3 to Game 7. However, they made far too many mistakes and it was not just their young players that were responsible. Veterans like Seabrook and Campoli were turning the puck over. Keith even had some bumps early in the series. Corey Crawford was outstanding in Game 7 and really kept the Hawks in it. Without Crawford playing lights out the Canucks skate away with Game 7 and Toews unbelievable effort to tie the game shorthanded is not a GTG and an afterthought.
How about Toews? Shut down by Kesler for almost 7 games and he scores shorthanded with less than 2 minutes left in the game to tie it. The MVP from the Vancouver Games almost singlehandedly gave his home country Canada a collective coronary.
I also got to write that Ryan Kesler was better in Game 7, but I think the media were off when criticizing him for not scoring. When your task is to eliminate Toews you have your hands full. Offense becomes a secondary thought. Kesler was outstanding in Game 7. He was physical and set up the first goal. Look for Kelser to score more in the second round.
So, the final thoughts on this epic first round series between Vancouver and Chicago is that the Canucks were able to overcome the defending champs best effort. This should provide the boost the Canucks need to play with confidence, composure and intensity in the conference semis. On the other hand, Chicago has to look at why they were unable to play with consistency throughout 2010-11 and fix it for next season.
Thursday, April 21, 2011
Mentally Tough Performer of the Week (Week 1 of the Playoffs)
Each week Hockey Edge Blog is choosing one player to be Mentally Tough Player of the Week. This is a player that exhibits toughness and performs well under pressure, bounces back after a big mistake, stays positive in the face of adversity, deals with pain and continues to perform, and/or leads with their performance.
Michal Neuvirth 23 year old goaltender for the Washington Capitals is the Mentally Tough Performer of the Week for Week 1 for his outstanding efforts as a playoff rookie. Winning 2 out of 3 games, one in OT, with a GAA of 1.45 and Save Percentage of .942, Neuvirth is providing the rock steady goaltending the Caps need to make a move in the East. This performance is in light of the pressure Washington is under to get over last year's upset at the hands of the Canadiens and with high expectations of going to the Finals. If Neuvirth remains steady in the net for the Capitals the rest of the East could be in trouble.
Michal Neuvirth 23 year old goaltender for the Washington Capitals is the Mentally Tough Performer of the Week for Week 1 for his outstanding efforts as a playoff rookie. Winning 2 out of 3 games, one in OT, with a GAA of 1.45 and Save Percentage of .942, Neuvirth is providing the rock steady goaltending the Caps need to make a move in the East. This performance is in light of the pressure Washington is under to get over last year's upset at the hands of the Canadiens and with high expectations of going to the Finals. If Neuvirth remains steady in the net for the Capitals the rest of the East could be in trouble.
Friday, April 15, 2011
Game 1 Represents Greater Pressure for Higher Seeds
Teams play for over 6 months to gain home ice in the playoffs. And in Game 1 of the playoffs they can lose that advantage. The pressure of feeling they should win, in some places like Vancouver they have to win, and feeling the need to be perfect can be overwhelming.
It is crucial that higher seeds get off to a good start, because the road team is thinking let's take one game on the road. That can be easier mindset to take into the playoffs. The expectations are not perceived as a burden and you play free. In contrast, the home team feels the burden of expectation to win on home ice. The longer a home team is behind in Game 1 the more the fans become anxious. You can feel the tension through the television. And, if we can feel it the team can feel it!
Over the years I have talked with many elite athletes and they will often say that the first game of a playoff or tournament scenario creates a lot of nerves. How do you manage those nerves on such a big stage? Prepare your self for it. Do the hard work during the week on the ice to feel strong, and off the ice watching video and visualizing your performance in different situations so you are confident and ready. Then, when game day arrives trust in that preparation, trust in your game plan, and trust in your teammates.
During the game focus on the process - how you want to play. Physical, fast, explosive, energetic... Or, on the strategies of your role - forecheck, backcheck, drive the middle, get the puck deep... These kinds of thoughts represent positive action which a player can control and thus get in to the flow of the game. Focusing on winning and losing, the scoreboard, is not under a player's control and thus can create more feelings of doubt, a lack of focus in the moment, and erratic play (hesitating or trying to do too much).
For those home teams that lost Game 1, Philly, Anaheim, and Boston, it is important to stay focused and stick to a game plan that works. Getting down 1-0 is no reason to panic. Game 2 is obviously huge for these teams, getting down 2-0 and going on the road is not a good proposition for any team.
It is crucial that higher seeds get off to a good start, because the road team is thinking let's take one game on the road. That can be easier mindset to take into the playoffs. The expectations are not perceived as a burden and you play free. In contrast, the home team feels the burden of expectation to win on home ice. The longer a home team is behind in Game 1 the more the fans become anxious. You can feel the tension through the television. And, if we can feel it the team can feel it!
Over the years I have talked with many elite athletes and they will often say that the first game of a playoff or tournament scenario creates a lot of nerves. How do you manage those nerves on such a big stage? Prepare your self for it. Do the hard work during the week on the ice to feel strong, and off the ice watching video and visualizing your performance in different situations so you are confident and ready. Then, when game day arrives trust in that preparation, trust in your game plan, and trust in your teammates.
During the game focus on the process - how you want to play. Physical, fast, explosive, energetic... Or, on the strategies of your role - forecheck, backcheck, drive the middle, get the puck deep... These kinds of thoughts represent positive action which a player can control and thus get in to the flow of the game. Focusing on winning and losing, the scoreboard, is not under a player's control and thus can create more feelings of doubt, a lack of focus in the moment, and erratic play (hesitating or trying to do too much).
For those home teams that lost Game 1, Philly, Anaheim, and Boston, it is important to stay focused and stick to a game plan that works. Getting down 1-0 is no reason to panic. Game 2 is obviously huge for these teams, getting down 2-0 and going on the road is not a good proposition for any team.
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Is Finishing the Regular Season on a Winning Streak a Sign of Cup Contenders?
Do teams need to finish on a winning streak to have a chance to win the Cup?
With the season coming to an end my helpful assistant Aaron Brinklow and I were calculating just how important it is to finish the season on a winning streak. Is it a new season or do teams carry the momentum (or lack of it) into the post season?
We looked at the last 10 regular season games for those teams that won the Cup last 5 years. Their winning percentage was .600. However, the previous 5 years of hockey from 1999-2004 it was only .440! So, the trend doesn't hold up over the past decade, but recently Stanley Cup Champions finished the regular season playing well.
The worst record of a Cup champion the last decade? The Detroit Red Wings in 02-03. They finished 1-3-4-2.
Winning the Cup has a lot to do with health, some good luck, and hot goaltending and special teams. So, to look further in to the question of do you need to finish on a winning streak let's look at the Conference Finalists - the final 4 teams.
Over the past 5 years the conference finalists have been winning in the last 10 games of the regular season at a clip of .575 (which turns in to about 11-12 points out of the last 20 available). So, they have been on the winning side but not red hot.
Checking the previous 5 years of hockey the results were consistent. Conference finalists had a winning percentage of .550. Again, winning but not untouchable.
For the teams entering the 2011 NHL Playoffs the best advice is to start over in the mind. If last year's first round is any evidence being a higher seed, having home ice, or winning more games in the last 10 games of the regular season does not predict winning in the playoffs. Wings and Flyers relax, now. It is a new season. Recent struggles can be overcome. Well, relax until the drama begins Wednesday night.
With the season coming to an end my helpful assistant Aaron Brinklow and I were calculating just how important it is to finish the season on a winning streak. Is it a new season or do teams carry the momentum (or lack of it) into the post season?
We looked at the last 10 regular season games for those teams that won the Cup last 5 years. Their winning percentage was .600. However, the previous 5 years of hockey from 1999-2004 it was only .440! So, the trend doesn't hold up over the past decade, but recently Stanley Cup Champions finished the regular season playing well.
The worst record of a Cup champion the last decade? The Detroit Red Wings in 02-03. They finished 1-3-4-2.
Winning the Cup has a lot to do with health, some good luck, and hot goaltending and special teams. So, to look further in to the question of do you need to finish on a winning streak let's look at the Conference Finalists - the final 4 teams.
Over the past 5 years the conference finalists have been winning in the last 10 games of the regular season at a clip of .575 (which turns in to about 11-12 points out of the last 20 available). So, they have been on the winning side but not red hot.
Checking the previous 5 years of hockey the results were consistent. Conference finalists had a winning percentage of .550. Again, winning but not untouchable.
For the teams entering the 2011 NHL Playoffs the best advice is to start over in the mind. If last year's first round is any evidence being a higher seed, having home ice, or winning more games in the last 10 games of the regular season does not predict winning in the playoffs. Wings and Flyers relax, now. It is a new season. Recent struggles can be overcome. Well, relax until the drama begins Wednesday night.
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
Hockey Edge NHL puck drop/Predictions for final few playoff spots
As I wrote earlier April 6 is the day I truly start blogging about the NHL. With the playoffs looming it's time to discuss who will make the final playoff spots.
As I write Anaheim is jumping on San Jose 3-1 and has a 5 on 3. Uh, make that 4-1 on Perry's 50th goal of the season (and a hat trick). The Ducks have some serious firepower and will be a dangerous team in the playoffs. Oh, yeah I definitely think the Ducks will get in. Selanne is still playing great hockey and the Ducks are getting career seasons from Visnovsky and Perry.
The winner of the Phoenix-LA game will be in, and soon enough the loser of the game. Chicago's OT winner from Toews tonight puts both Calgary and Dallas in the position of having to gain every point in the last games. I like Chicago to get in and Dallas and Calgary to miss narrowly.
In the East fewer teams are involved fighting for 2 playoff spots. Buffalo only needs a win and the Rangers 3 points to get to the magical playoff threshold of 94 points. As much as I like Carolina's young team I don't think they will be able to catch the Sabres or Rangers. The Sabres have Philly and Columbus, and the Rangers the Thrashers and Devils. I think they will get to at least 94 points leaving the Hurricanes again on the outside looking in.
Like all predictions these could be way off, but that's what makes it fun. Oh and now it's 6-1 Ducks. Who wants them in the playoffs?
As I write Anaheim is jumping on San Jose 3-1 and has a 5 on 3. Uh, make that 4-1 on Perry's 50th goal of the season (and a hat trick). The Ducks have some serious firepower and will be a dangerous team in the playoffs. Oh, yeah I definitely think the Ducks will get in. Selanne is still playing great hockey and the Ducks are getting career seasons from Visnovsky and Perry.
The winner of the Phoenix-LA game will be in, and soon enough the loser of the game. Chicago's OT winner from Toews tonight puts both Calgary and Dallas in the position of having to gain every point in the last games. I like Chicago to get in and Dallas and Calgary to miss narrowly.
In the East fewer teams are involved fighting for 2 playoff spots. Buffalo only needs a win and the Rangers 3 points to get to the magical playoff threshold of 94 points. As much as I like Carolina's young team I don't think they will be able to catch the Sabres or Rangers. The Sabres have Philly and Columbus, and the Rangers the Thrashers and Devils. I think they will get to at least 94 points leaving the Hurricanes again on the outside looking in.
Like all predictions these could be way off, but that's what makes it fun. Oh and now it's 6-1 Ducks. Who wants them in the playoffs?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)